Tomorrow (August 6, 2018) at 3pm in First Circuit Court in downtown, we will have a historic hearing regarding my motion to stay of election on August 11, 2018.

There are a few major disputes in the case of Ms. Hanabusa’s disqualification as gubernatorial candidate.
Among other things,

1. If my complaint in court is considered as a written objection or not; (although I already legally proved filing my complaint in court should have stayed all following actions in election office, by law).
My opponents failed to argue back why it cannot be the written objection, by law.

Simply, admission by omission.

2. If fed elected officer should be excluded in application of the state mandate even if the fed officer is a state candidate. Again, my opponents failed to answer back. Admission by omission: My argument was if so, it is discriminatory and unconstitutional.
Furthermore, “any” “public” officer should include fed officer, since no word, only “state” officer, can be found in the mandate.
Also, Cobb’s court never made opinion regarding fed officer seeking for state office.

3. My opponents claim my motion should be denied since the election is already in progress. But, in fact, it was due to Mr. Nago’s inaction and refusal to communicate with me or court early. There may exist conflict of interest, and further investigation (poss. including criminal) and discovery may be necessary.

Aloha.