HNN-Governor got call that missile alert was false 2 minutes after it was sent
My message to fellow People of Hawaii,
(If it was an intentional false alert),
As a Democrat,
I apologize in the fullest extent; and, (as long as I am in control), I promise it will never happen under my administration, (if I get elected).
If Gov. Ige is unable to explain further, I have no other choice but to ask for his resignation.
And, we may truly need reform in our party.
Aloha.
Assisted Suicide bill should not be passed.
Please remember these reps, and call and remind them not to implement the bill.
I suspect one of the main reasons of the bill is to save money in the name of death with dignity, but possibly wanton disregard to human lives, intentionally or unintentionally, (worse evil than anyone could imagine).
(Fyi, the assisted suicide has been already, currently, held and practiced among the patient families privately; and we don’t need extra law to legalize it.)
If passed, I would see among the most affected people may be “poor people on medicaid” who are chronically and/or terminally ill patients.
We should rather focus on improving our mental and emotional health, especially of those who may be implementing and/or performing the bill, e.g. government officials including lawmakers, hospital and its administrators, insurance and related people, healthcare providers including doctors and nurses.
If we still want to pursue the bill, we may need to prioritize and do the thorough vetting process, first. Once the complete vetting process (and education) are done, then we can implement it.
But, at our current (general) emotional and mental status, we may rather need to focus on our (esp. those who are related to performing the prospective bill) emotional improvement and growth, first.
Simply, impementing the law may not be among our priorities; but, improving our emotional health may be more urgent and important, at this time.
Aloha.
If Ms. Hanabusa has been following my posts regarding her illegality and disqualification, running for governor, then she may know she now does not have much choices (only 3 choices in the checkmate situation, which may not look and/or be good for saving her face).
However, out of 3 choices, withdrawing from governor race may be the better option for her best interest (e.g. she can still stay in US congress), although disgraceful.
Maybe, she may want to find exit strategy, from this wrongful governor race.
So, I expect her announcement of withdrawal from the governor race, hopefully soon; but probably much later, since she just announced it, hoping people forget about it?…lol.
Aloha.
Today, I had some good discussion with a friend (well educated man), regarding Ms. Hanabusa’s illegality and disqualification, running for Governor.
Regardless merit in the case (if and when I challenge and file objection), he was afraid the court may also be corrupted.
Although I may not totally disagree, I still believe the court may not have much choice, but to disqualify Ms. Hanabusa.
[Dear my fb lawyer friends, it is time for you to participate. If you want to avoid legal responsibility, you may just press “like” (agree) or “sad” (disagree) buttons, if you still want to show your position.]
Among other reasons,
1. The court is the highest Supreme Court.
2. They need to publish their decision, which have to be a case law like Cobb vs State case, which means their decision cannot be too deviated from Common Sense or logic.
3. In Cobb’s case, the court concluded “Resign to Run mandate” is intended for candidates for State office, (although it was written vaguely).
4. Ms. Hanabusa’s case is from Federal to State position, which is she is candidate for State office.
5. The focal point on the mandate is the first section, “ANY elected public officer”, in the mandate, should include federal officers, too, (even if the mandate was intended only for candidates for state office).
6. If the court unreasonably decides “any” means only state officer, then they deny existence of Fed offices, which is unconstitutional. So, it can not be a case law.
7. Also, if the court unreasonably interpret as if it (“any”) meant only state officer, then, I would challenge the court that ” then, why didn’t the mandate specify it? (We cannot find the word any elected “state” officer in the section or in the whole mandate.)
8. If the court would want to rule in the same way as in Cobb’s case, the words in the section of mandate should have been “An” elected public officer, but not “ANY” elected public officer.
Once, the court decides this section of mandate applies to Ms. Hanabusa’s case, then, they need to determine if Ms. Hanabusa already violated the law against the mandate.
Among other things,
1. The mandate clearly states Ms. Hanabusa “shall resign from that office BEFORE BEING ELIGIBLE as a candidate for another public office.”
2. Ms. Hanabusa has already formally launched her campaign without resigning from her current position as US congresswoman as of Jan 8, 2018, which disqualified her entrance on governor race.
3. Ironically, on Jan 5, 2018, Ms. Hanabusa call for Mr. Doug Chin’s resignation, before running for US congress.
4. On Jan 7, 2018, Mr. Chin announced his resignation from his current position as AG, even though he may be protected by Cobb’s case.
Aloha.